Compared to HDDs, what is a potential downside of SSDs?

Compared to HDDs, what is a potential downside of SSDs?

• A. Faster read/write speeds
• B. Lower storage capacity
• C. Higher durability
• D. Lower power consumption

Answer: (B)

When comparing solid-state drives (SSDs) to hard disk drives (HDDs), a notable downside of SSDs is often considered to be their lower storage capacity, especially in the context of consumer products. Historically, SSDs have offered less maximum storage than HDDs. While SSD technology has advanced significantly and large-capacity SSDs are available, they tend to be more expensive per gigabyte compared to traditional HDDs, which can provide terabytes of storage at a lower cost. This means that for users requiring a large amount of storage at an economical price—such as for data-intensive applications or video storage—HDDs may still be the preferred option despite the performance advantages of SSDs. Thus, when evaluating which aspect could be seen as a downside for SSDs relative to HDDs, the lower storage capacity is a valid consideration.

When comparing solid-state drives (SSDs) to hard disk drives (HDDs), a notable downside of SSDs is often considered to be their lower storage capacity, especially in the context of consumer products. Historically, SSDs have offered less maximum storage than HDDs. While SSD technology has advanced significantly and large-capacity SSDs are available, they tend to be more expensive per gigabyte compared to traditional HDDs, which can provide terabytes of storage at a lower cost.

This means that for users requiring a large amount of storage at an economical price—such as for data-intensive applications or video storage—HDDs may still be the preferred option despite the performance advantages of SSDs. Thus, when evaluating which aspect could be seen as a downside for SSDs relative to HDDs, the lower storage capacity is a valid consideration.